What is the context window?
1M tokens.
Qwen3.6 Flash is available on A2Agent as qwen3.6-flash at $0.200 per 1M input tokens, with a 1M context window, through one OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Cheap multimodal calls at 1M when you want a settled Flash release.
| Model id | qwen3.6-flash |
|---|---|
| Platform | Qwen |
| Context window | 1M |
| Tagged for | chat, vision |
| Discount | … |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.200 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $1.20 |
Prices synced with platform billing (USD per 1M tokens).
curl https://a2agent.me/v1/chat/completions \
-H "content-type: application/json" \
-H "authorization: Bearer sk-your-a2agent-key" \
-d '{
"model": "qwen3.6-flash",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Reply with OK"}]
}'If you are choosing today, compare against Qwen3.8 Flash before wiring this id into a client. Same window, same vision tag, lower rate on both sides.
Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 output, on the 1M window every Qwen model here shares, with the vision tag. Two newer Flash releases undercut it. Qwen3.7 Flash matches the $0.20 input and halves the output to $0.80. Qwen3.8 Flash goes to $0.15 and $0.47. On the output rate alone 3.6 Flash is the most expensive of the three, and that matters because Flash-tier work is usually high volume. The reason to stay on it is stability rather than price: a prompt suite already tuned against this release. Anything new is better started on Qwen3.8 Flash, which is cheaper on both sides with the same window and the same modality.
1M tokens.
3.8 Flash lists lower on both sides at $0.15 and $0.47, with the same window and tag. Stay on 3.6 Flash only to keep a validated setup from moving.
Yes, it carries the vision tag alongside chat.
Cheaper on both sides, $0.20 and $1.20 against $0.50 and $3.00, on the same 1M window with the same tag.
Trial credit on sign-up, billed per token, no minimum spend.